Skip to content
Verification Before Completion

Verification Before Completion

MIT
Repository Docs
Featured markdown Development
qualitytestingverification

Summary

Never claim work is complete, fixed, or passing without running the check and reading the output first.

Features

  • Requires evidence before any success claim
  • Runs the verification command and reads the output
  • Blocks the 'should work now' failure mode

Install This Skill

Add this skill to your favorite AI agent in a few steps.

Any AI agent

This skill is plain instructions — it works with any assistant that accepts custom instructions or system prompts.

  1. Copy the skill content with the button below.
  2. Paste it into your agent's instruction file or system prompt (for example AGENTS.md, .cursorrules, or a custom instructions field).
  3. Ask the agent to apply the skill whenever the task matches.

Skill Content

Markdown Content

Copy this content and use it with your preferred AI agent

# Verification Before Completion

## Overview

**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.

**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**

## The Iron Law

```
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
```

If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.

## The Gate Function

```
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:

1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
   - If NO: State actual status with evidence
   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim

Skip any step = lying, not verifying
```

## Common Failures

| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
|-------|----------|----------------|
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |

## Red Flags - STOP

- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- Thinking "just this once"
- Tired and wanting work over
- **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**

## Rationalization Prevention

| Excuse | Reality |
|--------|---------|
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |

## Key Patterns

**Tests:**
```
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
```

**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**
```
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
```

**Build:**
```
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
```

**Requirements:**
```
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
```

**Agent delegation:**
```
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report
```

## When To Apply

**ALWAYS before:**
- ANY variation of success/completion claims
- ANY expression of satisfaction
- ANY positive statement about work state
- Committing, PR creation, task completion
- Moving to next task
- Delegating to agents

**Rule applies to:**
- Exact phrases
- Paraphrases and synonyms
- Implications of success
- ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness

Description

"That should fix it" is the single most expensive sentence an agent can produce. This skill prohibits it.

Before claiming that work is done, a bug is fixed, or tests pass, it requires actually running the relevant command and confirming the output says so. Evidence before assertion — every time, including for changes that look obviously correct.

It also covers what counts as verification for different kinds of change: a passing test suite, a successful build, a manual check of the running application, or a query against real data. And it covers what to do when verification fails, which is to say so rather than to try one more speculative fix and claim victory.

Part of the Superpowers collection.

Related Skills

Skill: Superpowers

by Jesse Vincent

New

An agentic software-development methodology: composable skills that push a coding agent through spec, plan, TDD and review instead of straight into code.

Development

Skill: SkillHone

by Tencent

New

Tencent's skill-evolution harness: it rewrites a whole skill folder — SKILL.md, scripts and references together — and lands every decision as a real Git issue, PR and wiki entry you can review.

Development

Skill: OpenSearch Launchpad

by OpenSearch Project

New

Take an OpenSearch search application from requirements to a running cluster — BM25, dense and sparse vectors, hybrid retrieval, agentic search and RAG, with relevance evaluation built in.

Development
2 views

Auth0's official agent skill: a router that detects your framework and intent, then loads the right Auth0 guidance for login, MFA, Organizations, tenant audits, debugging or provider migration.

Development
Browse all skills →