ResearchRabbit
Summary
Citation-graph exploration for literature reviews — start from one paper and map the field around it visually.
Description
ResearchRabbit approaches literature review as network exploration rather than keyword search. You seed a collection with a few papers you know are relevant, and it maps what cites them, what they cite, and which authors connect them.
How it works
- Similar work. From a seed set, it surfaces related papers by citation relationships rather than by title overlap, which finds work that uses different terminology for the same idea.
- Interactive graphs. Citation networks and author networks are explorable — click a node to expand the neighbourhood.
- Collections that learn. As you add papers, recommendations sharpen.
- Alerts when new papers appear that fit a collection, so a review stays current after you finish it.
- Collaboration. Share collections with co-authors and comment on papers.
- Zotero sync for keeping references in your existing manager.
Why it works
Keyword search finds the papers that use your words; citation graphs find the papers your field considers related. Those are different sets, and the second one is usually the one you were missing.
Free for academic use — the team has committed to keeping it free for researchers — with no ads and no paywalled tier.
Reviews
Similar App Suggestions
Elicit
AI for systematic literature review — search 125 million papers, extract data into tables, and screen at scale.
SciSpace
An AI research assistant over 280 million papers — chat with PDFs, run literature reviews, and decode dense text.
OpenEvidence
A clinical answer engine for doctors, grounded in peer-reviewed medical literature with citations on every claim.
Connected Papers
Enter one paper and get a visual graph of the work around it — prior art, derivatives, and adjacent research.
Undermind
A deep-search research assistant that reads full papers, not abstracts, to find work others miss.