OpenEvidence
Summary
A clinical answer engine for doctors, grounded in peer-reviewed medical literature with citations on every claim.
Screenshots
Description
OpenEvidence answers clinical questions using the peer-reviewed medical literature. It is built for practising clinicians at the point of care, where the question is specific, the time is short, and an unsourced answer is worthless.
What it does
- Answers clinical questions with every statement linked to its source — trials, guidelines, and reviews
- Draws on major journals and guideline bodies through content partnerships, so the underlying corpus is authoritative rather than scraped
- Handles patient-specific framing. Questions can include comorbidities, contraindications, and demographics rather than being generic.
- Stays current, which matters because guidance changes and textbooks do not
Access and model
OpenEvidence is free for verified healthcare professionals in the United States, funded by advertising rather than subscriptions. Verification is required, which is appropriate — this is a clinical decision-support tool, not a consumer health app.
Important caveat
It supports clinical judgement; it does not replace it. Every answer is traceable to sources specifically so a clinician can evaluate the evidence themselves. It is not intended for patients seeking medical advice.
Reviews
Similar App Suggestions
Elicit
AI for systematic literature review — search 125 million papers, extract data into tables, and screen at scale.
SciSpace
An AI research assistant over 280 million papers — chat with PDFs, run literature reviews, and decode dense text.
Connected Papers
Enter one paper and get a visual graph of the work around it — prior art, derivatives, and adjacent research.
Undermind
A deep-search research assistant that reads full papers, not abstracts, to find work others miss.
ResearchRabbit
Citation-graph exploration for literature reviews — start from one paper and map the field around it visually.